Entstehungsdatum
26. Jänner 1624
Absendeort
Konstantinopel nach Wien
Sender
Johann Jakob
Kurtz von Senftenau
Empfänger
Ferdinand II.
Archiv
ÖStA, HHStA Wien
Staatenabteilungen, Türkei I
Kt. 109, Kv. 2, fol. 45r-52v
Staatenabteilungen, Türkei I
Kt. 109, Kv. 2, fol. 45r-52v
Beilagen:
Edition
Aneliya Stoyanova, Zsuzsanna Cziráki, Manuela Mayer
Datenmodellierung
Stephan Kurz, Jakob Sonnberger, Dimitra Grigoriou
hg. von
Aneliya Stoyanova, Zsuzsanna Cziráki, Manuela Mayer, Stephan Kurz, Jakob Sonnberger
Lizenz
Abstract
In keeping with his earlier promise, Kurtz reports on the financial transaction with
Ali Agha: he promised him 8,000 thalers, and then received another 5,000 thalers from
him for a gift to the grand vizier, so that he owes him a total of 13,000 thalers.
The money is to be sent to Buda from Vienna, and Kurtz will not be able to travel on
from there until it arrives. This should not be a problem, for, in accordance with
the emperor’s orders, Hieronymus Bonacina has promised a financial envelope of 30,000
thalers for the mission. Kurtz justifies the need for this transaction in 18 points:
he would not receive an audience with the grand vizier without a gift; other envoys
also gave gifts; in this way he could influence the orders to the pasha of Buda; Ali
Agha is the grand vizier’s most important adviser on Hungarian affairs, there is no
one else at the Porte who understands them; he has already helped a lot in peace
matters; Ali Agha can help to detach the pasha of Buda from Gábor Bethlen; if not
financed, Ali Agha could do a lot of harm to the cause of peace; he was forced to
borrow money due to lack of sufficient cash; if he stays longer at the Porte it will
cost even more money; he had to obtain information on rebels from Abaza Hasan Pasha;
as his departure is uncertain, he asks for a bill of exchange for further expenses.
The envoy sent by the sultan to the emperor is Ali Agha’s son-in-law, so he should be provided with an appropriate gift. He recommends Sebastian Lustrier and Giovanni Paolo
Damiani, who work at the Habsburgs’ permanent mission in Constantinople. He urgently requires further instructions from Vienna, because their lack impairs his ability to negotiate and gives off the impression that
he lacks authority. PS. A courier arrived to him with
the documents still requested from Sofia after this letter had been closed, so that
in a few days he will appear for an audience with the grand vizier and ask for
compensation for the damages on the border and the release of the prisoners. He
endeavours to dissuade the Porte from supporting Bethlen, but in this matter the
pasha of Buda has the greatest say. Kurtz has learned from Michael Starzer that the
Ottomans have captured Bujak in Hungary. He asks him to send the bills of exchange
urgently through his Venetian colleague Bonacina.
Schlagwörter
audience, Aulic Chamber, bribe, correspondence, courier, diplomatic gifts, finances, grand vizier, Habsburg resident, Holy Roman Emperor, internuntius, interpreter, Ottoman governor-general of Buda, Ottoman family networks, prince of Transylvania, revolt
Zitiervorschlag
Johann Jakob Kurtz von Senftenau an Ferdinand II., Konstantinopel,
26. Jänner 1624, dechiffrierte Abschrift, Edition: Aneliya Stoyanova, Zsuzsanna Cziráki, Manuela Mayer, Datenmodellierung: Stephan Kurz, Jakob Sonnberger, Dimitra Grigoriou, in: Die Gesandtschaft des Johann Jakob Kurtz von Senftenau
(1623–1624), hg. von: Aneliya Stoyanova, Zsuzsanna Cziráki, Manuela Mayer, Stephan Kurz, Jakob Sonnberger (Digitale Edition von Quellen zur habsburgisch-osmanischen
Diplomatie 1500–1918, hg. von Arno Strohmeyer, Projekt 4), Wien 2024.
Online unter: https://gams.uni-graz.at/o:kuse.l.hbg.16240126
Permalink/Handle:
Online unter: https://gams.uni-graz.at/o:kuse.l.hbg.16240126
Permalink/Handle: